Data Science Phase II Evaluation

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

Data Science Phase II Evaluation

This form is to be completed by due July 15th, 2022 by 11:59pm (CT). Students will need to complete the form separately for each proposal they are evaluating. Mentors will need to complete the form for each project they are supervising.

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more

Email *

What is your name? *

Are you a mentor or a student? *

Mentor

Student

Co-Instructor

What is the title of the project proposal title that you are evaluating? *

### Proposal Strengths and Weaknesses

Considering what you have seen in the team's report and proposal, please evaluate the overall project proposal on the following criteria and include comments below each score justifying the score with examples of strengths and weaknesses. Use the following scoring scale:

1 - Absent / Exceptionally Poor
2 - Below Average
3 - Satisfactory
4 - Very Good
5 - Outstanding

Clinical Relevance *

Proposal addresses an important issue relevant to clinical practice

Exceptionally Poor

1

2

3

4

5

Outstanding

Clinical Relevance Comments

Strengths and weaknesses of the proposal

Background *

Report provides background information on the reverent data sets, analysis methods, and previous findings

Exceptionally Poor

1

2

3

4

5

Outstanding

Background Comments

Strengths and weaknesses of the reports.

Formulation *

Proposal articulates a clear, well-formulated research question

Exceptionally Poor

1

2

3

4

5

Outstanding

Formulation Comments

Strengths and weaknesses of the proposal.

Dataset Relevancy *

Dataset(s) is appropriate for addressing the proposed problem (relevant with sufficient size and quality)

Exceptionally Poor

1

2

3

4

5

Outstanding

Dataset Relevancy Comments

Strengths and weaknesses of the proposal.

Data Complexity *

Project contains sufficient challenge in the acquisition, processing, and management of data

Exceptionally Poor

1

2

3

4

5

Outstanding

Data Complexity Comments

Strengths and weaknesses of the proposal.

Analysis Relevancy *

Analysis method(s) are appropriate for addressing the proposed problem (relevant and matching current literature)

Exceptionally Poor

1

2

3

4

5

Outstanding

Analysis Relevancy Comments

Strengths and weaknesses of the proposal.

Analysis Complexity *

Project contains sufficient difficulty in undertaking its described, iterative analysis

Exceptionally Poor

1

2

3

4

5

Outstanding

Analysis Complexity Comments

Strengths and weaknesses of the proposal.

Clarity *

Report and Proposal were well-written in a professional, concise, understandable manner

Exceptionally Poor

1

2

3

4

5

Outstanding

Clarity Comments

Strengths and weaknesses of the submission.

### Overall Assessment of Project

Time Commitment *

Based on your understanding, how much time do you expect this project to take per team member on average?

Less than 20 hours

20 - 50 hours

Beyond 50 hours

Time Commitment Comments

Completion *

Based on your understanding, on a scale of 1-10, what is the likelihood that this project can be successfully completed as proposed?

Extremely Unlikely

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Almost Certain

Completion Comments

What appears to you to be the most significant obstacles to the project's completion or issues with its proposed timeline?

Impact *

If the project is carried out as planned, on a scale of 1-10, what would be its likely impact?

Very little

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Very strong

Impact Comments

### Miscellaneous

Any additional feedback for the team or the course instructors?

A copy of your responses will be emailed to the address you provided.

Submit

Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

reCAPTCHA

This form was created inside of Google Apps @ Illinois. Report Abuse