NERC Feedback Form 2025

Please complete the survey below to provide feedback to our presenting residents.

Thank you!

Evaluation Tips
1. Be honest and constructive
2. Provide concise written feedback in your comments.
3. Identify one thing the presenter did well and one thing they can improve.
4. Some common considerations when giving feedback: Explain the part of the presentation you're addressing. Be specific so the recipient understands the context. Describe the behavior and the impact. Make suggestions for how to improve.
Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
Resident's Name *
Title/Topic of Presentation *
Your Role *
Required
Rate each section of the presentation using the following scale
1 - Poor: unacceptable
2 - Fair: acceptable, but needs significant improvement/development
3 - Good: acceptable, but needs some improvement/development
4 - Very Good: acceptable, very minimal improvement/development needed
5 - Excellent: accomplished, no areas for improvement/development identified

Slide design - clear, readable, augmented the presentation well

Poor
Excellent
Clear selection

Organization - presentation was organized and flowed logically

Poor
Excellent
Clear selection

Clarity - project and methods clearly described, sufficient background to understand the project, results presented for each objective, conclusions are clear

Poor
Excellent
Clear selection

Confidence - presented confidence and with enthusiasm


Poor
Excellent
Clear selection

Expertise - demonstrated expertise on the topic


Poor
Excellent
Clear selection

Verbal communication - good rate, tone, volume, etc.


Poor
Excellent
Clear selection

Non-verbal communication - mannerisms, eye contact, etc.

Poor
Excellent
Clear selection

Response to questions - prepared for questions, answered appropriately

Poor
Excellent
Clear selection

Timing - presented in 10-12 minutes with 3-5 minutes for Q&A

Poor
Excellent
Clear selection

Objectives/Rationale - reasons for selecting project are clear, objectives clearly stated

Poor
Excellent
Clear selection

Methods - methods are appropriate to answer research question, statistics appropriate for study design, IRB approval if required

Poor
Excellent
Clear selection

Results - results are presented clearly, relevant to pharmacy practice

Poor
Excellent
Clear selection

Conclusions - conclusions drawn match the results presented, are not overstated, next steps are appropriate

Poor
Excellent
Clear selection

Strengths of the project/presentation

Areas for improvement

Additional comments for the presenter

Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Does this form look suspicious? Report

Google Forms