𝗣𝗟𝗘𝗔𝗦𝗘 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗩𝗢𝗧𝗘 𝗜𝗡-𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗘 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗘𝗫𝗔𝗠𝗣𝗟𝗘𝗦:

𝗣𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗶𝗻-𝗱𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗵 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝗲𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 – 𝗮𝘁 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗶𝗳𝘁𝘆 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀! 𝗠𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂'𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝗻-𝗱𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂'𝗿𝗲 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝘀𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗴𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗱𝗶𝗱.*

𝗗𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗯𝗲 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗳 𝗮 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗿𝗹𝘆 𝘀𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗲 – 𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗿𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗻-𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗼𝘄 – 𝗼𝗿 𝗶𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘁𝗿𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝘆𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗺𝘂𝗺

1 - A really poor annotation with zero redeeming qualities. The editor who accepted or created the annotation should be penalized for their deviation of Genius' editorial standards.

2 - The annotation is severely lacking in certain areas, it may contain misspellings, a lack of citations, or incorrect formatting.

3 - The annotation has some nice information but needs to be flushed out more. It may contain a stretch, very poor grammar, or briefly restate the line in areas.

4 - The annotation is good, but contains information that's too surface level – a definition of a slang term, what a brand-name or drug is.

5 - The annotation is excellent. It correctly uses sources, quotes, and various other levels of research to provide immense information. Annotations voted this high can still contain very minor, nit-picky, errors. Be fair to your fellow contributors!

You can put whatever you want if voting for you own annotation*