PHYSICS Performance Evaluation Environment Usability Questionnaire

JavaScript isn't enabled in your browser, so this file can't be opened. Enable and reload.

What is your involvement in the PHYSICS Project?

I do not participate / I am external to the project

I contribute to the Smart Manufacturing Use Case

I contribute to the eHealth Use Case

I contribute to the Smart Agriculture Use Case

I contribute to the Technical Developments of PHYSICS

I have another role in PHYSICS.

Clear selection

The following statements are related to your previous experience with various relevant software development aspects. Please state in how far you agree with the statements below. *

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

I have experience in building docker images

I have experience in using docker images

I have experience in using automation servers

I have experience in functional programming concepts

I have experience in event driven applications

I have experience in deploying (not serverless) applications

I have experience in creating, deploying, and executing serverless applications

I have experience in using visual programming tools

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

I have experience in building docker images

I have experience in using docker images

I have experience in using automation servers

I have experience in functional programming concepts

I have experience in event driven applications

I have experience in deploying (not serverless) applications

I have experience in creating, deploying, and executing serverless applications

I have experience in using visual programming tools

PHYSICS Performance Evaluation Environment

The PHYSICS Performance Evaluation Environment (PEE) offers a set of artefacts (Load generator, Openwhisk monitor subflow, PEF models) that aim at measuring and investigating performance aspects of FaaS systems.

Which statement best describes your current level of experience with using the PHYSICS Performance Evaluation Environment?

I don't know what it is.

I know what it is, but I have not used it.

I have experimented with it once, or twice.

I have used it for measurements.

I have used it a lot.

I have helped build or design it.

Clear selection

The following statements relate to the PHYSICS Performance Evaluation Environment (PEE). Please indicate in how far you agree with the statements below. *

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

I think that I would use the PEE frequently.

I found the PEE unnecessarily complex.

I thought the PEE was easy to use.

I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use the PEE.

I found the various functions in the PEE were well integrated.

I thought there was too much inconsistency in the PEE.

I would imagine that most developers would learn to use the PEE very quickly.

I found the PEE very cumbersome to use.

I felt very confident using the PEE.

I need to learn a lot of things before I could get going with the PEE.

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

I think that I would use the PEE frequently.

I found the PEE unnecessarily complex.

I thought the PEE was easy to use.

I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use the PEE.

I found the various functions in the PEE were well integrated.

I thought there was too much inconsistency in the PEE.

I would imagine that most developers would learn to use the PEE very quickly.

I found the PEE very cumbersome to use.

I felt very confident using the PEE.

I need to learn a lot of things before I could get going with the PEE.

PHYSICS Components

The following questions are about specific PHYSICS components.

The following statements relate to the use of various other PHYSICS components. Please indicate in how far you agree with the statements below. *

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Node-RED eases the usage and adjustment of the load generators and OW monitors.

The options provided by the OW monitor and load generator are useful

The provided artefacts aid in abstracting details about FaaS systems.

The monitors and generators can be adapted in order to support modifications that I need

The PEE eases the performance analysis of my functions

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Node-RED eases the usage and adjustment of the load generators and OW monitors.

The options provided by the OW monitor and load generator are useful

The provided artefacts aid in abstracting details about FaaS systems.

The monitors and generators can be adapted in order to support modifications that I need

The PEE eases the performance analysis of my functions

Which other features could be added to the load generators or Openwhisk monitors?

Did you find out any bugs or limitations of the provided tools?

Submit

Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

This form was created inside of Physics. Report Abuse

Forms